Tennis, a sport celebrated for its elegance, intensity, and rich history, offers a unique element that influences the outcome of matches and the style and strategy of the players: the different types of tennis courts.
Unlike many sports confined to a single type of playing field, tennis thrives on variety. From the lush, perfectly manicured lawns of Wimbledon to the gritty red clay of Roland Garros, the surface underfoot is as much a part of the game as the racquet and ball.
As a lifelong tennis player and a fan of all racquet sports, I’ve been fascinated watching and participating in the explosion of pickleball, which encourages players of all ages and levels to grab a paddle and hit the court to meet new people and spend time with friends and family.
On the surface, pickleball and tennis have a lot in common, but dig a little deeper, and you’ll find quite a bit of differentiation between the two. Whether you’re looking to cross the divide or simply want to explore what they have to offer, one of the best places to start is understanding where they are similar and different.
We hope you love this article. Just so you know, TennisCompanion may collect a small share of sales from the links on this page to help keep this site running. Learn more.
When evaluating tennis racquets, one of the attributes you’ll likely come across is string patterns, such as 16×19 or 18×20, which refers to the number of main (vertical) and cross strings a racquet contains.
Like a racquet’s weight and balance or head size and length, string patterns influence performance, so exploring why they matter and what you can expect from the available options is a valuable exercise.
We hope you love this article. Just so you know, TennisCompanion may collect a small share of sales from the links on this page to help keep this site running. Learn more.
As a parent, your child’s safety and comfort are of utmost importance, and when it comes to sports, this is especially true. Beyond selecting the proper size racquet, buying a quality pair of tennis shoes is one of the best ways to set your child up for success.
Tennis shoes are designed specifically for the court and offer enhanced stability and support to help prevent injury while delivering optimal traction to reduce the likelihood of slips and falls.
We hope you love this article. Just so you know, TennisCompanion may collect a small share of sales from the links on this page to help keep this site running. Learn more. Disclosure: Wilson gave me these frames to evaluate, but they did not pay me to write this review or influence its contents.
New in 2023, the Wilson Shift is an innovative line of tennis racquets designed from the ground up to help players generate maximum spin and controllable power.
Wilson offers the 99 and 99 Pro v1 models for the first-generation Shift series release, each using the same underlying technology and design concepts but featuring slightly modified specs to deliver distinct performance characteristics.
In this in-depth review and playtest, I cover the Shift v1’s design, ideal string setup, and on-court performance, along with my notes on its pros and cons and recommendation for who should buy it.
I also provide a side-by-side comparison of the 99 and 99 Pro, giving you all the info necessary to make an informed buying decision on the best racquet for your needs.
For their Shift line of racquets, Wilson opted for a white cosmetic or, more specifically, the color they’ve dubbed Arctic Prism, which I think perfectly describes its look.
The Shift 99 300 and 99 Pro 315 resemble the color of a pristine glacier, with a unique reflective quality that looks awesome in the sun with very few visual distractions. Wilson also went with a clear grommet strip and bumper guard to keep the frame’s design as clean and simple as possible.
At the racquet’s throat, you’ll find the word Shift printed on the outside in black and bright orange for the ‘I.’ Opposite, Wilson is printed in matte white overlayed with a smaller bright orange ‘W.’
On the inside of the throat, the head size and model are highlighted in bright orange, along with the weight and string pattern printed below in light grey. Also painted in light grey are the specs listed inside the throat.
Finally, at the top of the racquet’s hoop, you’ll find a single bright orange line to help your stringer quickly identify the racquet’s center when mounting it for stringing.
Overall, it’s a pretty cool, eye-catching design that’ll have broad appeal and does a great job of driving interest.
Construction
For years now, Wilson has closely researched the unique bending properties of a tennis racquet, which heavily influence its performance, including spin, power, stability, and comfort.
As a result of their efforts, Wilson first released the Clash in 2019, a racquet with a unique bending profile that delivered well-balanced performance and outstanding comfort, which they later revised as the second-generation Clash in 2022.
However, building upon what they learned with the Clash, Wilson has continued its research and testing of frame bending under the W|Labs moniker to push the boundaries of racquet construction.
Eventually, their team landed on a fresh racquet design and the foundation for the Wilson Shift, enhancing lateral flex in line with a player’s swing path for maximum spin while reducing horizontal bending for power and maintaining torsional stability for control.
Right out the gate, they knew they were onto something unique, but to get the racquet to the finish line, they further refined the frame’s geometry and construction with the help of real-world feedback from playtesters using the racquet.
Now in their final state, the Wilson Shift 99 and 99 Pro v1 represent the cutting edge of Wilson’s racquet technology, providing exceptional spin, controllable power, and arm-friendly comfort for experienced players seeking these attributes.
Strings & Tension
The Wilson Shift’s dominant design principle is helping players generate maximum topspin, so to complement that goal, I opted to string the 99 300 and 99 Pro 315 with 16 gauge or 1.3 mm Luxilon Alu Power at 55 lbs (24.95 kg).
For optimal performance, Wilson has a recommended string tension for both Shift racquets between 48 – 58 lbs (22 – 26 kg, so I kept it in that range at 55 lbs (24.95 kg) for my playtest.
As far as gauge goes, I went with 16 gauge or 1.3 mm because I’m a frequent string breaker, and the Shift 99 300’s 16×20 string pattern will lend itself to plenty of string movement and friction that typically leads to faster string breaks.
Typically, I would be more inclined to string the Shift 99 Pro 315 with a thinner 17 gauge or 1.25 mm version of Luxilon Alu Power due to its tighter 18×20 string pattern that will see less string movement. However, I opted to use the same thicker version for a closer comparison between the racquets.
If comfort is a concern, another option is stringing the Shift racquets as a hybrid, with polyester in the mains for spin and a softer multifilament in the crosses to help soften up the string bed, improving comfort.
In the construction section of this review, I shared a lot about what Wilson hoped to accomplish with their Shift racquets, which is helpful to review and understand before making a purchase.
However, at the end of the day, what really matters is how the racquet feels in your hand and performs on the court.
To that end, I’ve put the Wilson Shift 99 300 and 99 Pro 315 through the paces during an extended playtest to help you gain transparent insight into their performance.
Below, you’ll find my ratings across several prominent attributes and strokes for a more objective evaluation, which I’ll use when reviewing any tennis racquet on this site.
Shot / Attribute
Wilson Shift 99 300
Wilson Shift 99 Pro 315
Groundstrokes
8.7
8.6
Volleys
8.3
8.4
Serves
8.6
8.5
Returns
8.5
8.6
Power
8.4
8.2
Control
8.3
8.4
Spin
8.9
8.7
Slice
8.7
8.7
Touch/Feel
8.3
8.4
Maneuverability
8.7
8.5
Stability
8.3
8.4
Comfort
8.5
8.4
Average
8.52
8.48
In the following sections, I’ve included my playtest notes on both racquets for a more detailed review of my experience playing with them and to bring further context to each rating.
Groundstrokes
Shift 99 300
From behind the baseline, the Shift 99 300 handled well, with a unique feel reminiscent of the Wilson Clash but a tighter response that lent itself to improved handling and control.
I hit with a semi-wester grip on my forehand and quickly felt right at home with the frame. Its 16×20 string pattern plays more like an open 16×19, with spin coming effortlessly during my three-quarter speed warm-up. I also found the racquet to accelerate with ease thanks to its 6 pt head light balance, so as I found a groove and increased my swing speed, I could really start to feel the frame’s added flex, helping amplify topspin further.
Even on my backhand side, where I hit a flatter ball, the extra grip was readily apparent, resulting in more action on my shots and freeing up a bit more angle cross court.
The Shift 99 300 also handled surprisingly well hitting slice, with equally as much bite as topspin and adequate stability to deflect a heavier ball to change the pace of a rally.
Regarding power, I didn’t find the racquet to be overbearing as long as I swung confidently, enabling the racquet to produce the necessary spin to keep the ball in the court.
At the same time, the Shift 99 300 didn’t produce an ultra-high level of precision, so I found I needed to give myself a bit of extra margin for error and avoid trying to hit too close to the lines.
Overall, I thought the Shift 99 handled well on groundstrokes, delivering on the promise of excellent spin and mid-range power with above-average comfort for a racquet in its class.
Shift 99 Pro 315
Hitting groundstrokes with the Shift 99 Pro 315, the added stiffness created by the tighter 18×20 string pattern is readily apparent, which has a noteworthy influence on the ball’s trajectory, lowering its launch angle and resulting in less topspin compared to its lighter Shift 99 300 counterpart.
The racquet is also 5 oz (15g) heavier, so it doesn’t swing as quickly and easily, making you work harder for topspin. Despite that, the frame isn’t void of spin. It’s simply not as pronounced, rewarding players with the strength and technique to swing it effectively with less margin for error over the net.
However, the upshot with the Shift 99 Pro is that it’s less powerful and delivers more accurate targeting giving you a greater overall sense of control, which can translate to added confidence.
The racquet’s extra weight also improves the frame’s stability, making it less likely to get pushed around when your opponent picks up the pace and hits harder – I especially appreciated these qualities hitting slice to help take the air out of the ball.
Regarding comfort, this frame’s 18×20 string pattern adds a bit of stiffness when hitting, so I’d give the edge to the lighter Shift 99 300, which also has an RA rating that’s 1 pt lower.
Although the Wilson Shift 99 Pro 315’s attributes somewhat dampen its spin effects, it’s well-suited to a strong intermediate to advanced player who can compensate with enough swing speed while appreciating its added control and precision.
Volleys
Shift 99 300
Hitting volleys at net, the Shift 99 300 delivered its biggest surprise, with solid all-around performance.
Although its mid-range weight is on par with other competitor racquets in its class, it plays with above-average stability and feel, doing a fantastic job redirecting pace. I credit the frame’s unique bending properties and design on this front.
Strung, the racquet is also highly maneuverable for an 11.2oz (318g) frame thanks to its 6 pt HL balance, helping you position the racquet quickly in all situations when moving forward.
As far as touch goes, I think this is where a bit of extra weight would go a long way to softening up its response while maintaining stability, but it’s not a slouch in this area, either.
Shift 99 Pro 315
The Shift 99 Pro 315 does every bit as well up at net as its lighter counterpart, but there’s a tradeoff with the extra weight.
The racquet isn’t quite as nimble at 11.7oz (332g) strung. However, there’s more mass to deliver even better stability, which comes in handy at higher levels of the game.
Regarding accuracy, the Shift 99 Pro does the job well, with the tighter 18×20 string pattern stiffening up the string bed to help prevent overhitting or an overzealous volley from going long.
Although it doesn’t offer best-in-class feel for its weight range, it performed well, and its extra weight comes in handy when playing with finesse, such as executing a well-placed drop volley.
Serves
Shift 99 300
I found the Shift 99 300 to offer a well-rounded performance hitting various types of serves, including slice, kick, or flat.
With its 6 pt head light balance, the racquet moves through the service motion with ease, enabling you to ratchet up your swing speed to hit with extra power or accentuate spin.
In particular, hitting a kick serve benefits from the frame’s vertical bending properties, with above-average spin production that ensures the ball clears the net with a high margin and rebounds off the court to keep the ball out of your opponent’s strike zone.
Although you won’t find the racquet helps you hit the biggest serves, with plenty of pop and variety at your fingertips, the Shift 99 300 is fully capable while serving.
Shift 99 Pro 315
Hitting serves with the Shift 99 Pro 315, I found the racquet to take more energy to swing while offering less free power, with its 11.7oz (332g) weight and stiffer 18×20 string pattern.
That also meant I didn’t find spin to be as pronounced as the lighter Shift 99 300, requiring tighter technique and a more pronounced swing to generate an aggressive kick or slice.
However, true to its design, the frame does offer more consistent and precise targeting, so once again, the racquet’s attributes are well-suited for the strong intermediate to advanced player who prefers extra weight and an emphasis on control.
Returns
Shift 99 300
On returns, the Shift 99 300 benefits from its speed and maneuverability, allowing you to pull the racquet back and accelerate through the ball quickly.
Like you’ll find on groundstrokes, the same spin-friendly characteristics are on full display when hitting returns, providing you with higher net clearance and extra margin for error.
Although I found its stability adequate for groundstrokes, the racquet’s lighter weight becomes more apparent when facing a big serve, including when trying to block the ball back, so you’ll need to consider that along with your level of play.
Shift 99 Pro 315
Although the Shift 99 Pro 315 is less agile than the 300 model, its 6 pt head light balance does ensure plenty of maneuverability on returns, so I didn’t find myself late to the ball.
Moreover, the frame’s added weight does a much better job of accurately deflecting pace and remaining stable under pressure, especially combined with an abbreviated backswing.
Overall, the Shift 99 Pro 315 is fully capable hitting returns with the control and precision to keep your opponent on their toes.
Summary
With the release of any new racquet line that’s pushing the boundaries of design and construction, there’s always the risk of the final product falling flat of expectations.
However, following the success of their Clash racquets, Wilson’s deep investment into the bending profile of their racquets continues to pay dividends, with the Shift v1 family delivering on performance expectations.
Within the Wilson lineup, I find the Shift to sit between the Blade and Clash line, not as control-oriented as the Blade or powerful as the Clash. In some respects, it’s a happy medium, providing players with an entirely new and compelling alternative.
With smaller 99 in (638.71 cm) head sizes and a baseline strung weight of 11.2oz (318g) for the lighter Shift 99 300, these racquets are well-suited for intermediate to advanced players who are looking to strike a balance between control and power with a strong emphasis on topspin that enhances precision.
Although the frame’s sleek aesthetics and spin-amplifying design characteristics may tempt beginners, I’d encourage them to look elsewhere for a more user-friendly option that weighs less and has a larger head size for maximum fun and ease of learning.
From a comfort standpoint, the Shift racquets hold their own, and I’d argue they’re better than their RA ratings suggest. At the same time, they wouldn’t be my first recommendation for players looking to switch to a more forgiving frame.
Overall, the Wilson Shift 99 300 and Shift 99 Pro 315 are two excellent additions to Wilson’s lineup that don’t heavily replicate any existing line, creating a new and appealing option that delivers balanced performance for the modern game.
One of the biggest decision points for players evaluating the Wilson Shift line is which model to purchase.
Although Wilson designed these racquets to deliver similar performance characteristics, a few spec modifications between the two resulted in a markedly different experience. Let’s start with a side-by-side comparison of the specifications for each.
Spec
Wilson Shift 99 300
Wilson Shift 99 Pro 315
Head Size
99 in² / 638.7 cm²
99 in² / 638.7 cm²
Length
27 in / 68.6 cm
27 in / 68.6 cm
Unstrung Weight
10.6 oz / 300 g
11.1 oz / 315 g
Strung Weight
11.2 oz / 318 g
11.7oz / 332g
Unstrung Balance
12.4 in / 31.5 cm / 9pts HL
12.4 in / 31.5 cm / 9pts HL
Balance
12.8in / 32.4cm / 6 pts HL
12.8in / 32.4cm / 6 pts HL
Swingweight
317
332
Stiffness
67
68
Beam Width
23.5 mm / 23.5 mm / 23.5 mm
23.5 mm / 23.5 mm / 23.5 mm
Material
Graphite
Graphite
Grip Type
Wilson Pro Performance
Wilson Pro Performance
String Pattern
16 Mains / 20 Crosses
18 Mains / 20 Crosses
Recommended Tension
48-58 pounds
48-58 pounds
Reviewing the data, they have three distinct differences: weight, swingweight, and string pattern.
From a performance standpoint, these differences make the Shift 99 300 lighter, easier to maneuver, a bit more powerful, and easier to swing, resulting in faster racquet head speeds that influence and maximize topspin.
On the other hand, the Shift 99 Pro 315 is heavier, aiding stability, with a stiffer stringbed that supports a more controlled response.
In both cases, one isn’t better than the other. Instead, these nuances in design and performance aim to appeal to two different groups of players: notably intermediate vs. advanced.
The Shift 99 300 is built first and foremost for intermediate tennis players who have developed sound technique and are looking for a frame that’s accessible with added control that supports their continued growth without being overly demanding.
Meanwhile, the Shift 99 Pro 315 skews more toward strong intermediate to advanced players competing at a high level who have developed the necessary strength and endurance to swing a heavier frame with added control while relying more on their technique to manipulate the ball.
To provide additional context, the table below compares the Wilson Shift 99 300 and 99 Pro 315 across several attributes and strokes, highlighting which performed better in a specific area.
Shot / Attribute
Wilson Shift 99 300
Wilson Shift 99 Pro 315
Groundstrokes
x
Volleys
x
Seves
x
Returns
x
Power
x
Control
x
Spin
x
Slice
x
Touch/Feel
x
Maneuverability
x
Stability
x
Comfort
x
Another consideration that might factor into your decision-making is string breakage. Without a doubt, I started to see quicker notching in strings of the Shift 99 300 vs. the Shift 99 Pro 315, so if you are a string breaker and opt for the lighter model, you’ll want to consider that in your racquet or string selection.
Meanwhile, you’ll find more durability with the heavier Pro model, so you’ll get away with a thinner gauge, which will also help soften up the stringbed and increase spin potential.
Ultimately, you’ll get the best results by selecting the racquet that most closely aligns with your skill level, experience, and performance characteristics you desire.
We hope you love this resource. Just so you know, TennisCompanion may collect a small share of sales from the links on this page to help keep this site running. Learn more.
Two years in the making, the Blade 98 18×20 v8 is Wilson’s latest revision to one of their most popular control-oriented racquets, which launches with a fresh new dynamic green and copper color-shifting cosmetic.
Due to its heavier 11.4 oz (323 g) strung weight, smaller 98in² (632) cm² head size, and thin 21 mm beam, the racquet will appeal primarily to strong intermediate to advanced players who’ve developed sound technique and are looking to maximize control and precision.
The 18×20 is one of two racquets in the lineup with a 98 in² head size, the other being the Wilson Bade 98 16×19. However, this model has a tighter 18×20 string pattern, providing more control, added precision, a firmer response, and a lower shot trajectory.
For its stiffness, the racquet has a low stiffness or RA rating of only 60, meaning the racquet is more flexible than most, providing exceptional comfort and excellent feel that’s ideal for hitting with finesse.
For added stability, the racquet continues to use FortyFive, a technology Wilson previously called FeelFlex. This unique graphite layup optimizes horizontal and vertical flex resulting in a lower stiffness for comfort while preventing twisting to help maximize stability and control.
New for 2021, Wilson introduces their Direct Connec handle, which fuses the butt cap to the racquet’s carbon fiber handle for added stability rather than stapling it, as is common practice for racquet manufacturers.
From the back of the court, the Wilson Blade 98 18×20 v8 offers lower power and a predictable response ideal for accurately placing the ball with depth. With a tighter string pattern, it’s not the most spin-friendly racquet, but it’s more than sufficient in this department.
Hitting volleys, the racquet’s weight and 4pt HL balance reduce maneuverability to a degree. However, it has the added benefit of helping maintain rock-solid stability when facing extra pace from an opponent. It also offers excellent feel, which is ideal for net play.
On serve, the racquet emphasizes control and precise ball striking. It’s not overly powerful, but due to its heavier weight, there’s plenty on tap for players who can generate the required racquet head speed. Fielding returns, the frame is a bit more demanding but rewards early preparation and performs exceptionally well against bigger serves.
Overall, the Wilson Blade 98 18×20 v8 is a terrific option for strong intermediate to advanced players looking for exceptional control.
Specifications
Here’s a table showcasing the Wilson Blade 98 18×20 v8’s specs alongside the seventh generations, so you can gain a sense of what’s changed if you’re considering an upgrade.
Spec
Blade 98 18×20 v8
Blade 98 18×20 v7
Head Size
98 in² / 632 cm²
98 in² / 632 cm²
Length
27 in / 69 cm
27 in / 69 cm
Strung Weight
11.4 oz / 323 g
11.4oz / 323g
Unstrung Weight
10.8 oz / 305 grams
10.8 oz / 305 grams
Strung Balance
33 cm / 4 pts HL
33 cm / 4 pts HL
Unstrung Balance
32 cm / 7 pts HL
32 cm / 7 pts HL
Swingweight
327
334
Stiffness
60
62
Beam Width
21mm / 21mm / 21mm
21mm / 21mm / 21mm
String Pattern
18 Mains / 20 Crosses
18 Mains / 20 Crosses Mains skip
String Tension
50 – 60 pounds
50 – 60 pounds
The Wilson Clash 98 18×20 v8 is available in the standard length of 27 inches and features a smaller 98in² (632) cm² head size with a closed 18×20 string pattern for added control.
For its weight, Wilson quotes the frame weighs 10.8 oz (305 g) unstrung, and the racquet I have on hand comes in very close to spec at just under 10.8 oz or 306 g, which is always appreciated and nice to see.
Some strings weigh more or less than others, but you can add roughly 18 or so grams for its strung weight.
On a related note, keep in mind that a tighter string pattern equates to slightly more string and weight in the head of the racquet when strung, which influences static weight, swingweight, and balance.
Balance or weight distribution throughout the racquet is 7 pts HL at 32 cm when unstrung. After installing strings, expect that to drop to 4 pts HL at 33 cm and a swingweight of 327.
The Wilson Blade 98 18×20 v8 is a high-comfort racquet, so it’s no surprise it features a lower stiffness or RA rating of 60, which falls on the lower end of the spectrum.
Finally, the racquet features a flat 21 mm beam all the way around.
Tech Features
The Blade 98 18×20 v8 features several technologies that help Wilson attain the unique performance and feel for this line of racquets.
However, for the 2021 release, the only new tech featured in this racquet is the DirectConnect handle.
Braided Graphite & Basalt
Like the previous generation, this frame maintains its braided graphite and basalt construction to give the racquet its unique flex and feel, the combination of which enhances control.
FortyFive
To improve vertical and horizontal flex for the modern swing path, Wilson leverages FortyFive, a proprietary technology that also maintains stability.
Parallel Drilling
Historically, manufacturers drilled grommet holes perpendicular to the frame regardless of the location around the racquet’s head. Instead, Wilson implements parallel drilling for the Blade for select grommets, resulting in a more prominent sweet spot and forgiving response.
DirectConnect Handle
Most companies staple their butt caps to the racquet’s handle and, although secure, leaves room for subtle movements. To solve this, Wilson fuses the butt cap directly to the racquet’s carbon fiber handle to eliminate movement and improve stability.
Top Grip Taper
Wilson adds a slight taper to the top of the grip to enhance how it feels to hold the racquet when hitting a two-handed backhand.
Ergonomic Butt Cap
Some butt caps feature a squared-off edge, which can cause discomfort in a player’s hand, especially when first learning to play. Wilson’s rounds the edges of their ergonomic butt cap to improve comfort.
Strings & Tension
Wilson recommends stringing the Blade 98 18×20 v8 with 17 gauge or 1.25 mm Luxilon 4G, a modern polyester that delivers excellent spin, control, and feel, along with above-average tension maintenance.
For tension with Luxilon 4G, Wisson suggests 53 lbs or 24 kg in the mains and crosses. However, they more broadly advise a tension between 50-60 lbs (23 – 27 kg) for optimal performance.
If you’re new to this racquet, I’d recommend you string the racquet for the first time at 55 lbs (25 kg) as a starting point. Then, after hitting with the racquet at this tension, you can adjust up or down to your preference, i.e., lower for more power, higher for more control.
Alternative String Recommendations
Luxilon 4G is an excellent string that some of the tour’s top pros, including the Williams sisters and Grigor Dimitrov, use.
However, if you’re looking for a different string that will pair well with the Wilson Blade 98 18×20 v7, I’d encourage you to check out the following polys, each of which I’ve found to perform very well.
Although my first recommendation for most players using this racquet will be a polyester tennis string, this type of string is stiffer and can be harsh on a player’s arm, causing discomfort over time.
If that’s a concern for you, I have two alternatives to consider. First, you could combine a polyester in the crosses with a multifilament or natural gut in the mains as a hybrid string setup.
If you’re still weary of using any polyester string in your racquet, a control-oriented multifilament is an excellent option that will be more forgiving while delivering less power.
Of course, a high quality softer multifilament is still a viable option if you’re looking for maximum comfort.
Stringing Instructions
Follow these instructions when stringing the Wilson Blade 98 18×20 v8.
Start the mains at the racquet’s throat
When stringing the mains, skip grommets 8T, 8B, 10T, 10B
Tie off the mains at 7B
If one-piece stringing: Start crosses at 8B, tie off at 6T
If two-piece stringing: Start crosses at 8T, tie off at 12B
Key:
T = Top of the Frame
B = Bottom of the frame
Alternative Racquets to Consider
The Wilson Blade 98 18×20 v8 is an excellent control-oriented tennis racquet, but other frames with similar performance characteristics are worth exploring if you’re undecided about this racquet.
Here are a few of my top picks for you to check out.
As a starting point, I’d recommend you check out and compare the specs for each to gain a high-level feel for their similarities.
Players Endorsing
The Wilson Blade is one of the most popular racquets on the pro tour. Here’s a list of players endorsing a model within this family of racquets.
Men (ATP)
Women (WTA)
Alex de Minaur
Alison Riske
Aljaz Bedene
Aryna Sabalenka
Alexander Peya
Astra Sharma
Andrey Kuznetsov
Barbora Strycova
Blake Mott
Jelena Ostapenko
David Ferrer (retired)
Kateryna Kozlova
David Goffin
Kiki Bertens (retired)
Dimitry Tursunov
Laura Robson
Dudi Sela
Lauren Davis
Filip Krajinovic
Madison Brengle
Guido Pella
Margarita Gasparyan
Juan Ignacio Londero
Natalia Vikhlyantseva
Jiri Vesely
Nina Stojanovic
Karen Khachanov
Paula Badosa
Laslo Djere
Petra Martic
Lorenzo Sonego
Polona Hercog
Lucas Lacko
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Michal Przysiezny
Serena Williams
Milos Raonic
Simona Halep
Nicolas Mahut
Venus Williams
Norbert Gombos
Veronika Kudermetova
Pablo Carreno Busta
–
Pedro Martinez
–
Roberto Carballes Baena
–
Salvatore Caruso
–
Sebastian Korda
–
Stefanos Tsitsipas
–
Tennys Sandgren
–
Ugo Humbert
–
Vasek Pospisil
–
Please keep in mind that players change racquets periodically, so I’ll do my best to keep this list up-to-date.
Prior Generation Comparsion
If you’re considering an upgrade from the seventh-generation Wilson Blade 98 18×20, check out the following table comparing the two models.
Spec
Blade 98 16×18 v8
Blade 98 18×20 v8
Head Size
98 in² / 632 cm²
98 in² / 632 cm²
Length
27 in / 69 cm
27 in / 69 cm
Strung Weight
11.3 oz / 320 g
11.4 oz / 323 g
Balance
32.6 cm / 5 pts HL
33 cm / 4 pts HL
Swingweight
317
327
Stiffness
61
60
Beam Width
21mm / 21mm / 21mm
21mm / 21mm / 21mm
String Pattern
16 Mains / 19 Crosses
18 Mains / 20 Crosses
String Tension
50 – 60 pounds
50 – 60 pounds
Aside from the pain job, very little has changed from the last racquet. The only change to the racquet’s tech is its new DirectConnect Handle, which provides a slight stability improvement.
Reviews
What’s your take on the Wilson Blade 98 18×20 v8? I’d love to hear your thoughts in the section below.
We hope you love this article. Just so you know, TennisCompanion may collect a small share of sales from the links on this page to help keep this site running. Learn more. Disclosure: Wilson gave me this frame to evaluate, but they did not pay me to write this review or influence its contents.
Fifteen years after releasing the original Blade, Wilson unveiled the eighth generation of the ever-popular racquet franchise in 2021, featuring a slick new chameleon paint job and a handful of refinements.
One of the most anticipated frames in the lineup is the Wilson Blade 98 18×20 v8, a formidable tennis racquet geared toward intermediate to advanced tennis players and well-known for its exceptional precision and control, excellent feel, and arm-friendly comfort.
We hope you love this resource. Just so you know, TennisCompanion may collect a small share of sales from the links on this page to help keep this site running. Learn more.
The Wilson Clash 108 v2 caters to beginners and early intermediates looking to take their game to the next level with power, spin, and exceptional comfort.
The racquet comes with a large 108 in² (697 cm²) that increases power and allows plenty of margin for error when hitting, while a larger sweetspot ensures a forgiving response on center shots.
The Wilson Clash 108 v2 is lighter at only 10.5 oz (297 g) strung and has an extended 27.25 in (69.2c cm) length for effortless swinging and added power. It also has an open 16×19 string pattern which helps grip the ball to generate topspin easier.
Core to the frame’s DNA, Wilson uses their FortyFive graphite layup. This proprietary technology helps ensure maximum comfort by enabling the racquet to achieve greater horizontal and vertical flex without sacrificing much power.
To maintain control, StableSmart integrates into the racquet’s throat and helps it retain stability and reduce twisting.
New for 2022, the frame receives an updated construction at the tip of the hoop to help deliver a more consistent response and increase the size of the sweetspot.
Hitting forehands and backhands, the racquet’s power and spin are easy to access, along with added depth of shot. At the net, the racquet offers a large target and allows for agile movement, which many will find an ideal companion for doubles.
The racquet easily swings when serving, offers plenty of power for picking up the pace, and allows for quick positioning on returns.
Overall, the Wilson Clash 108 v2 is a capable option for beginners looking to step into a performance racquet that will help level up their game and keep their arms healthy as they grow.
Specifications
To help players considering an upgrade, I’ve included the specs of the original racquet alongside the second generation.
Spec
Clash 108 v2
Clash 108 v1
Head Size
108 in² / 697 cm²
108 in² / 697 cm²
Length
27.25 in / 69.22 cm
27.25 in / 69.22 cm
Strung Weight
10.5 oz / 297 g
10.5 oz / 297 g
Unstrung Weight
9.9 oz / 280 g
9.9 oz / 280 g
Strung Balance
0 pts EB / 34.5 cm
0 pts EB / 34.5 cm
Unstrung Balance
3 pts HL / 33.5 cm
3 pts HL / 33.5 cm
Swingweight
–
–
Stiffness
–
–
Beam Width
24.5 mm / 24.5 mm / 24.5 mm
24.5 mm / 24.5 mm / 24.5 mm
Composition
Graphite
Graphite
String Pattern
16 Mains / 19 Crosses
16 Mains / 19 Crosses
String Tension
50 – 60 pounds / 22.7 – 27.2 kg
48 – 58 pounds / 21.8 – 26.3 kg
Unique to the Wilson Clash 108 v2, you’ll find it comes in an extended length of 27.25 (69.22 cm), which gives players added leverage to swing faster for more power and spin.
Its head size is on the larger end of the spectrum at 108 in² (697 cm²), and it comes with an open 16×19 string pattern for added power spin and a more forgiving feel.
Wilson quotes the racquet at a lightweight 9.9 oz (280 g) for its unstrung weight. The racquet I have on hand weighs [slightly more] at 9.75 oz (276.4 g). Keep in mind that it’s common for some variation in weight from one frame to the next.
You can add roughly 18 grams for its strung weight, a reasonable average for various strings.
Balance refers to a racquet’s distribution of weight, and this racquet measures 3 pts HL at 33.5 cm unstrung, which drops to 0 pts EB at 34.5 cm with strings installed.
As an arm-friendly frame, the Wilson Clash 108 v2 has the lowest stiffness index in this family of racquets at 9.0. Beyond comfort, stiffness also contributes to a racquet’s power, control, and feel.
Finally, you’ll find this racquet has a flat beam that measures 24.5 mm all the way around.
Tech Features
The following features showcase some of Wilson’s unique technology in use for this racquet.
FortyFive
FortyFive is a unique graphite construction that allows for optimal horizontal and vertical flex, contributing to the Wilson Clash 108 v2’s lower stiffness for comfort without sacrificing torsional stability for control.
StableSmart
To further optimize the Wilson Clash 108 v2, the racquet features StableSmart. This unique geometric throat design helps ensure the racquet’s flex doesn’t detract too much from its power while maintaining optimal stability and predictable response.
Parallel Drilling
Wilson drills select grommets for the Clash 108 v2 parallel to the frame vs. following the arch or angle of the racquet’s head, so the strings pull straight through from one end to the other. The result is a larger sweetspot for improved comfort and better response.
Agiplast Components
Wilson introduces a plant-based bumper guard, grommet system, and butt cap to reduce its environmental footprint further. The new material results from a partnership with Agiplast, an Italian plastic compound manufacturer.
Strings & Tension
Wilson recommends 17 gauge (1.25 mm) Luxilon Smart when stringing the Wilson Clash 108 v2. Regarding tension, players will find optional performance between 50 – 60 lbs (22.7 – 27.2 kg).
Luxilon Smart is a polyester tennis string that adapts to a player’s swing speed. It offers a more forgiving response when swinging slow but stiffens up for control when swinging fast.
An excellent place to start when stringing this racquet for the first time is in the middle of the recommended tension at 55 lbs (24.9 kg). However, it’s worth noting that you may want to drop it a bit to get the most out of Luxilon Smart, which has a recommended tension of 40 – 48 lbs (18.1 – 21.8 kg)
Alternative String Recommendations
Although Luxilon Smart is a decent option, it’s a stiffer polyester that can cause arm discomfort for some players over time. With that in mind, I’d encourage players to explore additional options.
If you’re looking for maximum comfort, here are a few of my favorite multifilaments that would pair well.
Players looking for a bit of added control might opt for a multifilament that tones down the power a bit. Here’s are a few solid options in that bucket.
Of course, another alternative would be to consider a hybrid string setup that combines a polyester and multifilament or natural gut. Doing so allows players to balance out the strengths and weaknesses of two different strings.
If you choose to go down this path, keep in mind that the string you use in the mains will dominate the overall feel.
You may even consider a less expensive synthetic gut that will provide moderate overall performance as another option.
Stringing Instructions
Follow these instructions when stringing the Wilson Clash 108 v2.
Start the mains at the racquet’s head.
When stringing the mains, skip grommets 7T, 9T, 7B, 9B.
Tie off the mains at 6B
Tie off the crosses at 5H
If two-piece stringing, tie off the crosses at 5T and 9B
Key:
T = Top of the Frame
B = Bottom of the frame
Alternative Racquets to Consider
The Wilson Clash 108 v2 is in a relatively unique class, especially when considering its comfort. With that said, there are a handful of worthy options to consider.
We hope you love this resource. Just so you know, TennisCompanion may collect a small share of sales from the links on this page to help keep this site running. Learn more.
Strong intermediate to advanced players looking for maximum comfort without sacrificing power will find the Wilson Clash 100 Pro v2 an enticing option with plenty of spin on tap.
New for 2022, the frame trades its 16×19 string pattern for a tighter 16×20, giving the racquet an extra cross string, which stiffens up the stringbed, lowers the launch angle, and aids control.
However, with a 100 in² (645 cm²) head size, there’s still plenty of grip for topspin. Wilson also redesigned the tip of the hoop’s construction for 2022, which aids consistency and increases the sweet spot’s size for a slightly more forgiving response.
Like the previous generation, this model retains Wilson’s patented FortyFive (previously called FeelFlex) graphite construction, enabling substantial horizontal and vertical flex, which absorbs shock, enhances ball pocketing, and gives the frame a distinct feel.
Despite the frame’s ultra-high flex, it retains stability and a consistent response through a unique geometric design of the racquet’s throat that Wilson refers to as StableSmart.
At 11.5 oz (326 g) strung, the racquet’s weight further enhances stability. At the same time, its 8 pt HL (32 cm) balance ensures the racquet still has plenty of maneuverability for players that have developed sufficient strength and technique to handle it.
The Wilson Clash 100 Pro v2 delivers a marked improvement in control from the baseline compared to the original, while spin remains easy-to-access despite the tighter string pattern. The racquet offers accurate replies at the net with plenty of weight for stability against bigger hitters. The racquet offers plenty of power on serve and extra precision hitting returns.
Overall, players looking for a control-centric players racquet that’s not quite as heavy for extra maneuverability and speed and top-notch comfort will appreciate the Wilson Clash 100 Pro v2.
Specifications
I’ve included the frame’s specs below alongside the original racquet so you can easily compare the changes.
Spec
Clash 100 Pro v2
Clash 100 Pro v1
Head Size
100 in² / 645 cm²
100 in² / 645 cm²
Length
27 in / 68.58c m
27 in / 68.58 cm
Strung Weight
11.5 oz / 326 g
11.5 oz / 325 g
Unstrung Weight
10.9 oz / 310 g
10.9 oz / 309 g
Strung Balance
8 pts HL / 31.6 cm
8 pts HL / 31.6 cm
Unstrung Balance
11 pts HL / 30.6 cm
11 pts HL / 30.6 cm
Swingweight
–
328
Stiffness
–
62
Beam Width
24.5 mm / 24.5 mm / 24.5 mm
24 mm / 24 mm / 24 mm
Composition
Graphite
Graphite
String Pattern
16 Mains / 20 Crosses
16 Mains / 19 Crosses
String Tension
50 – 60 pounds / 22.7 – 27.2 kg
48 – 58 pounds / 21.8 – 26.3 kg
Like most tennis racquets, the Wilson Clash 100 Pro v2 is 27-inches in length and comes with a 100 in² (645 cm²) head size and tighter 16×20 string pattern for control and topspin.
The racquet I have on hand weighs 10.95 oz (310.6 g), which isn’t too far from the quoted spec of 10.9 oz (310 g). Although racquet manufacturers strive to hit a target weight, some variance is natural among every company.
Every tennis string has a different weight, but you can add roughly 18 grams to arrive at the racquet’s strung weight.
Its balance is 11 pts HL at 30.6 cm when unstrung, which drops to 8 pts HL at 31.6 cm with strings installed.
The Clash 100 Pro v2 has a low stiffness index of 11, which translates to added comfort for your arm.
Finally, the racquet’s flat 24.5 mm beam helps ensure the racquet retains a bit of extra power.
Tech Features
Developing the Wilson Clash 100 Pro v2, Wilson incorporated a unique selection of tech features.
FortyFive
FortyFive is a unique graphite construction that allows for optimal horizontal and vertical flex, contributing to the Wilson Clash 100 Pro v2’s lower stiffness for comfort without sacrificing torsional stability for control.
StableSmart
To further optimize the Wilson Clash 100 Pro v2, the racquet features StableSmart. This unique geometric throat design helps ensure the racquet’s flex doesn’t detract too much from its power while maintaining optimal stability and predictable response.
Parallel Drilling
Wilson drills select grommets for the Clash 100 Pro v2 parallel to the frame vs. following the arch or angle of the racquet’s head, so the strings pull straight through from one end to the other. The result is a larger sweetspot for improved comfort and better response.
Agiplast Components
Wilson introduces a plant-based bumper guard, grommet system, and butt cap to reduce its environmental footprint further. The new material results from a partnership with Agiplast, an Italian plastic compound manufacturer.
Strings & Tension
Tennis strings are a personal preference, but to help players get started, Wilson suggests 17 gauge or 1.25 mm Luxilon ALU Power with a recommended tension between 50 – 60 lbs (22.7 – 27.2 kg).
Luxilon ALU Power is one of my picks for the best polyester tennis strings that emphasizes control, spin, and feel. It’s a solid choice for this racquet, but it’s a stiffer string that can sometimes lead to discomfort over an extended period.
Regarding tension, I’d recommend you string the racquet 55 lbs (24.9 kg) if it’s your first time using the racquet, which provides you with plenty of room to move up for control or down for power.
If you use the original model of this racquet, you may want to consider bumping up your previous tension slightly, as its recommended tension was 48 – 58 lbs (21.7 – 26.3 kg).
Alternative String Recommendations
You can string the Wilson Clash 100 Pro v2 with any type of string, but polyester will likely be a popular option. With that in mind, here are a few of my favorite alternatives to Luxilon ALU Power.
If you value the Wilson Clash 100 Pro v2 for its comfort, then you may want to consider opting for a hybrid string setup, which combines a poly with a multifilament or natural gut.
Doing so will provide you with added comfort. However, you won’t have to give up too much control or spin. The string you use in the mains will dominate the overall feel giving you additional options, i.e., a softer string in the mains will be more forgiving.
Stringing Instructions
The Wilson Clash 100 Pro v2 is straightforward to string. The following instructions will help you get it right.
Start the mains at the racquet’s throat
When stringing the mains, skip grommets 7T, 9T, 7B, 9B.
Tie off the mains at 6B
Tie off the crosses at 5T
If two-piece stringing, tie off the crosses at 5T and 8B
Key:
T = Top of the Frame
B = Bottom of the frame
Alternative Racquets to Consider
The Wilson Clash 100 v2 is an excellent frame, but it’s not the only option in this category of modern player’s racquets. The following are a handful that I’d recommend you check out, which offer similar performance and specs.
A quick comparison of the specs is a great place to start.
Players Endorsing
No ATP or WTA players currently endorse the Wilson Clash 100 Pro v2. It’s worth keeping in mind that this racquet is relatively new to the market, so this may change over time.
Reviews
What’s your take on the Wilson Clash 100 Pro v2? I’d love to hear your thoughts in the section below.
We hope you love this resource. Just so you know, TennisCompanion may collect a small share of sales from the links on this page to help keep this site running. Learn more.
With a fresh new red anodized elastic paint job, the Wilson Clash 100 v2 stands out in this family of racquets as the frame with the broadest appeal. Although best suited for intermediate players, it’s also a solid option for higher-level athletes that desire the room to personalize their frame’s specs.
With an approachable 10.4 oz (295 g) weight, the Clash 100 v2 swings fast, a key factor for topspin, which the frame further enhances with a mid-range 100 in² (645 cm²) head size and open 16×19 string pattern that improves grip on the ball.
For arm-friendly comfort, the racquet features an ultra-low stiffness index of 11, resulting from Wilson’s responsive FortyFive graphite construction that gives the racquet a unique feel and enables greater horizontal and vertical flex.
To retain power and stability as the racquet bends, FortyFive works in tandem with StableSmart, which stabilizes the frame and prevents twisting for a consistent response. For 2022, Wilson reconstructs the tip of the hoop to enhance consistency further while increasing the sweet spot’s size.
Hitting groundstrokes, the Wilson Clash 100 v2 accelerates quickly, delivering excellent spin that enables players to achieve greater net clearance and depth of shot while retaining control and the ability to dictate placement.
Transitioning to the net, players will find the racquet is easy to maneuver thanks to the racquet’s mid-range weight and 7 pt HL (32 cm) balance that keeps more of the weight in the handle. It doesn’t pack quite as much stability as its counterpart, the Clash 100 Pro, but it offers plenty of power to put away the ball.
The racquet’s speed enables players to get that extra action hitting kick serves and slice, but it’s also more than capable of flattening out the ball and turning up the pace. Quick reflexes are a must when hitting returns, and the Wilson Cash 100 v2’s fast acceleration helps ensure you can get yourself into position for a well-timed reply.
Overall, intermediate players will appreciate this frame’s all-around performance and extra comfort.
Specifications
Below you’ll find the specs for this frame alongside the first generations so you can easily compare the racquets.
Spec
Clash 100 v2
Clash 100 v1
Head Size
100 in² / 645 cm²
100 in² / 645 cm²
Length
27 in / 68.58c m
27 in / 68.58c m
Strung Weight
10.9 oz / 309 g
10.9 oz / 309 g
Unstrung Weight
10.4 oz / 295 g
10.4 oz / 295 g
Strung Balance
7 pts HL / 32 cm
7 pts HL / 32 cm
Unstrung Balance
10 pts HL / 31 cm
10 pts HL / 31 cm
Swingweight
–
312
Stiffness
–
55
Beam Width
24.5 mm / 24.5 mm / 24.5 mm
24.5 mm / 24.5 mm / 24.5 mm
Composition
Graphite
Graphite
String Pattern
16 Mains / 19 Crosses
16 Mains / 19 Crosses
String Tension
50 – 60 pounds / 22.7 – 27.2 kg
48 – 58 pounds / 21.8 – 26.3 kg
The Wilson Clash 100 v2 comes in your standard length of 27 inches and features a mid-range 100 in² (645 cm²) head size with an open 16×19 string pattern.
Wilson quotes the racquet weighs in at 10.4 oz (295 g) unstrung, but it’s common to find variance from one frame to the next. In this case, this frame weighs 10.34 oz (293.2 g).
Not all tennis strings have the same weight, but you can add 18 or so grams for the racquet’s strung weight.
For its balance, the Wilson Clash 100 v2 measures 70 pts HL at 31 cm when unstrung. With strings installed, it reduces to 7 pts HL at 32 cm.
One of the Wilson Clash 100 v2’s unique features is its lower stiffness rating. This frame clocks in a low stiffness index of 11, which helps ensure maximum comfort for your arm.
Finally, the racquet features a flat beam that measures 24.5 mm all the way around.
Tech Features
Wilson incorporates a handful of unique tech features for the construction of this racquet.
FortyFive
FortyFive is a unique graphite construction that allows for optimal horizontal and vertical flex, contributing to the Wilson Clash 100 v2’s lower stiffness for comfort without sacrificing torsional stability for control.
StableSmart
To further optimize the Wilson Clash 98 v2, the racquet features StableSmart. This unique geometric throat design helps ensure the racquet’s flex doesn’t detract too much from its power while maintaining optimal stability and predictable response.
Parallel Drilling
Wilson drills select grommets for the Clash 100 v2 parallel to the frame vs. following the arch or angle of the racquet’s head, so the strings pull straight through from one end to the other. The result is a larger sweetspot for improved comfort and better response.
Agiplast Components
Wilson introduces a plant-based bumper guard, grommet system, and butt cap to reduce its environmental footprint further. The new material results from a partnership with Agiplast, an Italian plastic compound manufacturer.
Strings & Tension
Wilson recommends stringing the Clash 100 v2 with 17 gauge or 1.25 mm Luxilon ALU Power, a popular polyester tennis string.
Wilson suggests stringing between 50 – 60 lbs (22.7 – 27.2 kg) for optimal performance, an ideal tension they arrived at after thoroughly testing the frame.
As a first-time user of this racquet, we’d recommend you string the racquet at 55 lbs (24.9 kg) to start. From there, you can adjust your tension up for control and down for power based on your experience hitting with the racquet.
Alternative String Recommendations
Luxilon ALU Power is one of my picks for the best tennis strings, which delivers excellent spin, lower power, and a surprisingly good feel for the type of string.
However, here are a few alternatives I’d encourage you to explore that also pair well with the Wilson Clash 100 v2.
If you’re coming to this racquet for comfort, polyester strings alone aren’t ideal as they’re stiff and can cause arm discomfort over time. Instead, I’d recommend considering hybrid stringing, which combines two strings to balance out performance.
You could pair a stiffer polyester with a multifilament or natural gut as one option. It’s worth noting that the string in the mains will dominate the overall feel, so the multifilament in the mains would provide you with more comfort.
For maximum comfort, you could string this racquet entirely with a multifilament, or you could opt for a less expensive synthetic gut.
Stringing Instructions
Follow these instructions when stringing the Wilson Clash 100 v2.
Start the mains at the racquet’s throat
When stringing the mains, skip grommets 7T, 9T, 7B, 9B.
Tie off the mains at 6B
Tie off the crosses at 5T
If two-piece stringing, tie off the crosses at 5T and 8B
Key:
T = Top of the Frame
B = Bottom of the frame
Alternative Racquets to Consider
The Wilson Clash 100 v2 is an excellent frame, but it’s not the only option in this category of modern player’s racquets. The following are a handful that I’d recommend you check out, which offer similar performance and specs.